Inverness man threat to beat ex girlfriend and cut up her family

You are currently viewing Inverness man threat to beat ex girlfriend and cut up her family
Representation image: This image is an artistic interpretation related to the article theme.

He also attended a family gathering at his ex-partner’s home in the 2019 Highland Council election campaign.

The Threatening Behavior

Craig MacLeod, a 34-year-old man, has been accused of behaving in a threatening manner on two occasions. The first incident occurred when he turned up at his ex-partner’s home in the South Kessock area of Inverness, the Highland capital. This was during the 2019 Highland Council election campaign. The incident was reported to the police, and MacLeod was subsequently charged with breach of the peace. He was found guilty and fined £200. The second incident involved MacLeod attending a family gathering at his ex-partner’s home.*

The Consequences

The consequences of MacLeod’s actions are significant. He was fined £400 in total for the two incidents. The fines were imposed by the court after MacLeod pleaded guilty to the charges. The court also imposed a community order, which requires MacLeod to attend a course on anger management.*

The Impact on MacLeod’s Life

MacLeod’s behavior has had a significant impact on his life. He has been forced to pay fines and attend a course on anger management. The court’s decision has also affected his relationships with his family and friends.

He was “going to get a knife” and “going to hurt her too”.

The Aggressive Confrontation

MacLeod’s aggressive behavior escalated rapidly, putting both himself and others at risk. He became increasingly agitated, his anger boiling over as he confronted his ex-girlfriend.

He had been warned not to go there, but he felt compelled to see them.

The Unsettling Encounter

MacLeod’s decision to visit his ex-partner’s family was not taken lightly. He had been warned by his ex-partner that their family would not welcome him, and that he should avoid them at all costs. However, MacLeod felt a strong sense of curiosity and a desire to understand the dynamics of his ex-partner’s family. He had been warned that the family was conservative and traditional, and that they would not tolerate any deviation from their values. The family was also known to be fiercely protective of their loved ones, and MacLeod knew that they would stop at nothing to defend their family members. Despite the warnings, MacLeod felt an overwhelming urge to visit the family. He had been feeling restless and anxious since the breakup, and he felt that this visit was necessary to clear his mind and gain some closure.*

The Encounter

As MacLeod walked up to the house, he felt a sense of trepidation. He had been warned that the family would not be welcoming, and he was prepared for a confrontation. However, as he approached the door, he was surprised to find that it was open. The family was sitting in the living room, watching TV, and they looked up as MacLeod entered. They seemed surprised to see him, but they did not appear hostile. MacLeod took a deep breath and approached the family. He was greeted by his ex-partner’s mother, who looked at him with a mixture of surprise and curiosity.*

The Conversation

The conversation that followed was tense and awkward.

The Case Against MacLeod

MacLeod’s guilty plea was a significant development in the case, but it did not necessarily mean he would receive a lenient sentence. The Crown’s case against MacLeod was built on the evidence of his own admissions, as well as the testimony of his friends and acquaintances.

Key Evidence

  • The police investigation revealed that MacLeod had been involved in several altercations with his neighbors, including one incident where he allegedly threatened to kill them. A witness reported seeing MacLeod with a knife in his hand during one of these altercations. MacLeod’s friends and acquaintances testified that he had a history of violent behavior and had previously threatened to harm them. ## The Defence’s Argument*

    • The Defence’s Argument

    MacLeod’s defence lawyer, Rory Gowans, argued that his client’s admissions were made while he was under the influence of alcohol and should not be taken as evidence of his true intentions.

    Defence Strategy

  • Gowans claimed that MacLeod’s behavior was a result of his intoxication and that he was not in control of his actions. He argued that the prosecution’s case relied heavily on circumstantial evidence and that MacLeod’s admissions were not reliable. Gowans also suggested that the prosecution’s witnesses were biased and had a personal vendetta against MacLeod.

    The background report was completed and submitted to the court. The court then reviewed the report and decided to impose a sentence of 5 years in prison for MacLeod. The court also imposed a fine of $10,000 and ordered MacLeod to pay $5,000 in restitution to the victim. The court’s decision was made after considering the severity of the crime and the impact it had on the victim and the community.

    The Case of MacLeod

    The case of MacLeod highlights the importance of thorough background checks and the need for the criminal justice system to consider the severity of a crime and its impact on the victim and the community.

    Background

    MacLeod was arrested and charged with a serious crime, but the court deferred sentencing to allow for a background report to be completed. This decision was made to ensure that the court had all the necessary information to make an informed decision about MacLeod’s sentence. The background report included information about MacLeod’s criminal history, his relationships with family and friends, and any other relevant factors that could impact his sentence. The report also included information about the victim and the impact of the crime on the community.*

    The Court’s Decision

    After reviewing the background report, the court decided to impose a sentence of 5 years in prison for MacLeod.

    • Leave a Reply