The court’s decision, which was unanimous, stated that the state’s ban on switchblades is unconstitutional. The court reasoned that the Second Amendment protects the right to bear arms, and that the state’s ban on switchblades infringes upon that right. The court’s decision is significant because it sets a precedent for other states to follow. It is a landmark ruling that could have a significant impact on gun control laws across the country. The decision also highlights the ongoing debate about the Second Amendment and its interpretation.

Campbell argued that the switchblade is a “weapon of mass destruction” and that the Second Amendment does not protect “weapons of mass destruction.”

This case is significant because it raises questions about the scope of the Second Amendment and its interpretation. The Second Amendment guarantees the right to bear arms, but its interpretation has been a subject of debate for decades. The Supreme Court has ruled on the scope of the Second Amendment in several cases, but the interpretation remains complex and contested.