This decision has sparked a debate among residents, with some expressing support for the right to carry switchblades, while others are concerned about the potential for increased violence. The debate is further complicated by the fact that switchblades are considered a dangerous weapon, and their possession and use are often regulated in other states. The decision has also raised questions about the scope of the Second Amendment and its application to modern-day society. The Bruen decision has been lauded by gun rights advocates as a victory, while critics have argued that it could lead to an increase in gun violence.

Campbell argued that the switchblade is a “weapon of mass destruction” and that the Second Amendment does not protect such weapons. This case is significant because it raises questions about the scope of the Second Amendment and its application to modern weaponry. The Second Amendment guarantees the right to bear arms, but its interpretation has been a subject of debate for centuries. The Supreme Court has ruled on the scope of the Second Amendment in several cases, but the interpretation remains complex and often controversial.